The truth about Hammersmith Bridge

Stephen Greenhalgh writes

Hammersmith & Fulham is a beautiful residential borough defined by the Thames at its southern and western border. However, it would be helpful if Londoners could cross it once in a while. Instead, we now face 6 miles of uncrossable water. Hammersmith Bridge, owned by the council has been shut to motorised traffic including buses and ambulances for nearly 3 years. The Labour council leader is a talented storyteller and has concocted a work of fiction on the LBHF website that absolves his administration of all blame and instead has tried to blame the previous Conservative council despite a statement on the 2nd September 2016 that “it remains the case that there are NO issues concerning the structural integrity of Hammersmith Bridge under its current weight restriction.”  

The reality is that this Labour council is largely responsible for the Hammersmith Bridge omnishambles: The Labour Council did not do their bit in properly maintaining the bridge and lost the expert officer expertise since the collapse of Triborough and Biborough collaboration which was a grotesque act of municipal vandalism on their part.  It is also clear that the Labour Council’s political leadership have not made the reopening the bridge to cars and buses a political priority. The council do not care about the traffic gridlock in west London but see it as a way of stopping cars coming into their borough and making Hammersmith Bridge open only to pedestrians and cyclists. The council has refused to supply engineering reports for which we as residents have paid and refusing to share information with the opposition. The most recent is the Denton report is one along with the top secret structural engineering reports of 2014/15.

Added to this the Mayor of London has bankrupted TfL so that TfL cannot afford to pay for infrastructure works and Mayor Khan dissolved the London Bridges fund in 2016 to spend the money on other Mayoral pet projects. Dealing with Mayor Khan’s TfL was also frustrating. They insisted on repeating the bridge assessment work and cost estimates that we had done even though we had used a reputable consultant who had amassed a huge amount of structural data. They also insisted on continuing to run increasing numbers of heavier hybrid buses over the bridge.

The council still hasn’t agreed a costed plan to remediate the bridge fully. Instead the council has plucked a figure out of the air to carry out much needed stabilisation works so pedestrians and cyclists are able to use the bridge at the very least. The reality is that is the Transport Secretary Grant Shapps and the Roads Minister, my colleague in the Lords, Baroness Vere, Chair of the government’s Hammersmith Bridge Task Force, who have had to step in to sort this mess out. The Labour council wouldn’t even have had Hammersmith Bridge re-opened to pedestrians and bikes had the government not intervened and funded 2/3rds of the costs as well as pledging 2/3rds of the  costs of its planned restoration and full re-opening by both funding 1/3rd directly and providing another 1/3rd to TfL.

It is the Conservative government that has insisted that the council fully re-open the bridge. All concerned have found the Labour council leader and H&F council a nightmare to deal with. Meanwhile, our main and local roads have become clogged up as a result whilst residents face another slap in the face with parking charges now rivalling the West End with hikes to between £5 and £6 an hour – up from £2.20 or £2.80. The streets and the parks are beginning to look scruffy and fly tipping has become endemic.

3 thoughts on “The truth about Hammersmith Bridge

  1. I’m afraid Grant Shapps needs to ‘grow a pair’ and step in to rectify this total embarrassment. I agree this is primarily a failure of Hammersmith council to maintain the bridge over many decades, compounded since the closure by an unhelpfully combative attitude towards the government.
    But this hopeless situation can’t go on. The unproductive co-dependency between government, LBHF council and TfL has to end. Taxpayers continually bail out TfL – but does this important piece of infrastructure get fixed? No. LBHF are still failing to put forward a costed business case after three years of stalling – unacceptable. It needs to be taken out of the hands of LBHF and TfL and the resulting bill for a full repair, done properly by motivated and competent experts, sent to them.

  2. The problem started in 1986 when thatcher abolished the GLC, which had been maintaining and repairing Hammersmith Bridge. The bridge was offered to Richmond or Hammersmith. At that time the council had no overall control with 25 Labour, 23 Conservative and 2 Lib Dem councilors. It is unclear who voted for it, but it came to Hammersmith, with no thought of raising toll revenue as a sinking fund for future repairs.

    In 1887, when the bridge opened, traffic was horses, carts and stage coaches. More recently it has included 44 tonne trucks. This has produced cracks in the stone piers, which support the cast iron towers that carry the suspension cables. Repair cost has been estimated at £100m but it is likely to be much more.

    It seems unjustified to lay the blame for this fiasco at the hands of recent or current council leaders. More likely, it crept up because of the general incompetence of council staff, its unwillingness to investigate anything until it is far too late. The A316, although formerly busy is not classed as a trunk road, so the ministry of Transport can justly claim that it is not responsible for repairs. However, that it clearly the only viable solution, now that the council is in such a mess.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s